Turner, Ken (2003) On neo- (and post-) Gricean conditionals International Journal of Pragmatics (14). pp. 135-154. ISSN 1342 2871Full text not available from this repository.
This paper attempts to examine the foundations of a semantic–pragmatic theory that is able to accommodate an elegant analysis of indicative and counterfactual conditionals. Such an analysis is unlikely to be cut from the same cloth as truth-conditional analyses. The principal intuition is that conditionals are not part of fact-stating discourse: instead, conditionals express uncertainties and thus require a very different semantics and a very different notion of validity. Gricean, Strawsonian, Stalnakerian (and, by implication, Lewisian) and Lyncanian analyses are discussed, and neo-Gricean analyses are mentioned. A general preference for an account which exploits conditional probabilities is expressed.
|Item Type:||Journal article|
|Subjects:||Q000 Languages and Literature - Linguistics and related subjects > Q100 Linguistics|
|Faculties:||Faculty of Arts > School of Humanities|
|Depositing User:||Languages Editor|
|Date Deposited:||16 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||18 Jun 2010 11:33|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year