Group art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial

Crawford, Mike J., Killaspy, Helen, Waller, Diane, Barnes, Thomas R.E., Barrett, Barbara, Byford, Sarah, Clayton, Katie, Dinsmore, John, Floyd, Siobhan, Hoadley, Angela, Johnson, Tony, Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria, King, Michael, Leurent, Baptiste, Maratos, Anna, O'Neill, Francis A., Osborn, David P., Patterson, Sue, Soteriou, Tony and Tyrer, Peter (2012) Group art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial British Medical Journal. pp. 1-9. ISSN 0959-8138

[img]
Preview
Text
Group_art_therapy.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (964kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.bmj.com

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate he clinical effectiveness of group art therapy for people with schizophrenia and to test whether any benefits exceed those of an active control treatment. Design: Three arm, rater blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Setting: Secondary care services across 15 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants: 417 people aged 18 or over, who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and provided written informed consent to take part in the study. Interventions: Participants, stratified by site, were randomised to 12 months of weekly group art therapy plus standard care alone. Art therapy and activity groups had up to eight members and lasted for 90 minutes. In art therapy, members were given access to a range of art materials and encouraged to use these to express themselves freely. Members of activity groups were offered various activities that did not involve use of art or craft materials and were encouraged to collectively select those they wanted to pursue. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were global functioning, measured using the global assessment of functioning scale, and mental health systems, measured using the positive and negative syndrome scale, 24 months after randomisation. Main secondary outcomes were levels of group attendance, social functioning, and satisfaction with care at 12 and 24 months. Results: 24 participants were assigned to either art therapy (n=140), activity groups (n=140), or standard care alone (n=137). Primary outcomes between the three study arms did not differ. The adjusted mean difference between art therapy and standard care at 24 months on the global assessment of functioning scale was -0.9 (95% confidence interval -3.8 to 2.1), and on the positive and negative syndrome scale was 0.7 (-3.1 to 4.6). Secondary outcomes did not differ between those referred to art therapy or those referred to standard care at 12 or 24 months. Conclusions: Referring people with established schizophrenia to group art therapy as delivered in this trial did not improve global functioning, metnal health, or other health related outcomes. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46150447.

Item Type: Journal article
Additional Information: © 2012 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Subjects: L000 Social Sciences
DOI (a stable link to the resource): 10.1136/bmj.e846
Faculties: Faculty of Health and Social Sciences > School of Applied Social Science
Depositing User: editor sass
Date Deposited: 09 May 2012 12:30
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2014 09:40
URI: http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/id/eprint/10398

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year