What is wrong with eliminating genetically-based disability?

Brecher, Bob (2011) What is wrong with eliminating genetically-based disability? Public Health Ethics, 4 (3). pp. 218-225. ISSN 1754-9973

[img]Microsoft Word (Article)
Restricted to Repository staff only

66Kb

Official URL: http://phe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/1...

Abstract

As our understanding of the genetic structure of our species has advanced, and our technological ability to manipulate that structure has become increasingly sophisticated, so we are increasingly able to screen foetuses for genetically-based conditions. That much is uncontroversial. What is controversial, however, is what, if anything, it is morally right to do with this knowledge and this ability. On the one hand, to prevent, if we can, people being born who will suffer grievously on account of a condition brought about by their genetic make-up would seem at least morally permissible, if not morally required. On the other hand, if we do so, then what does that say about our attitudes to and treatment of currently living people who suffer from the condition in question? I conclude that where the conditions concerned really do constitute disability; and where such disability cannot be avoided by changing social norms, or where it should not be avoided by changing them, so that the condition is no longer perceived as a disability but as normal: under these circumstances, eliminating disability devalues no one, whether that real disability is social, educational, physical or mental.

Item Type:Journal article
Additional Information:© The Author 2011
Subjects:L000 Social Sciences > L400 Social Policy
V000 Historical and Philosophical studies > V500 Philosophy
A000 Medicine > A300 Clinical Medicine
DOI (a stable link to the resource):10.1093/phe/phr029
Faculties:Faculty of Arts
ID Code:10385
Deposited By:Bob Brecher
Deposited On:15 May 2012 12:41
Last Modified:23 May 2012 14:42

Repository Staff Only: item control page